Questo sito o gli strumenti terzi da questo utilizzati si avvalgono di cookie necessari al funzionamento ed utili alle finalità illustrate nella cookie policy. Se vuoi saperne di più o negare il consenso a tutti o ad alcuni cookie, consulta la cookie policy. Cliccando su "accetto" acconsenti all’uso dei cookie.

Jus centrale ita bianco

Working with Research Integrity—Guidance for Research Performing Organisations: The Bonn PRINTEGER Statement

Documento di presentazione del “Bonn PRINTEGER Statement”.

 

Articolo di Ellen‑Marie Forsberg, Frank O. Anthun, Sharon Bailey, Giles Birchley, Henriette Bout, Carlo Casonato, Gloria González Fuster, Bert Heinrichs, Serge Horbach, Ingrid Skjæggestad Jacobsen, Jacques Janssen,  Matthias Kaiser, Inge Lerouge, Barend van der Meulen, Sarah de Rijcke, Thomas Saretzki, Margit Sutrop, Marta Tazewell, Krista Varantola, Knut Jørgen Vie, Hub Zwart, Mira Zöller, pubblicato in Science and Engineering Ethics, 31 maggio 2018.

 

Il testo del documento è disponibile a questo link e nel box download.

Abstract

This document presents the Bonn PRINTEGER Consensus Statement: Working with Research Integrity—Guidance for research performing organisations. The aim of the statement is to complement existing instruments by focusing specifi-cally on institutional responsibilities for strengthening integrity. It takes into account the daily challenges and organisational contexts of most researchers. The statement intends to make research integrity challenges recognisable from the work-floor per-spective, providing concrete advice on organisational measures to strengthen integ-rity. The statement, which was concluded February 7th 2018, provides guidance on the following key issues:

§ 1. Providing information about research integrity

§ 2. Providing education, training and mentoring

§ 3. Strengthening a research integrity culture

§ 4. Facilitating open dialogue

§ 5. Wise incentive management

§ 6. Implementing quality assurance procedures

§ 7. Improving the work environment and work satisfaction

§ 8. Increasing transparency of misconduct cases

§ 9. Opening up research

§ 10. Implementing safe and effective whistle-blowing channels

§ 11. Protecting the alleged perpetrators

§ 12. Establishing a research integrity committee and appointing an ombudsperson

§ 13. Making explicit the applicable standards for research integrity

Informazioni aggiuntive

  • Autore: Carlo Casonato
  • Tipo di pubblicazione: Articolo
Letto 251 volte